Monday, June 25, 2007
Harriet Harman
Gordon Brown showed his ruthless streak last night by dumping Leftie Harriet Harman into a non-job MINUTES after she became Labour’s deputy leader. Instead, Mr Brown told the party faithful she will become Labour chairman. He cannot afford to give Ms Harman a powerful role because of her Leftie views.
Also, she and her husband Dromey exposed the £14mn loans for peerages matter. There must be plenty more there to expose, such as Brown's own Charity fraud. I am further a little puzzled still about her own need, and what her financial involvement is, in borrowing £10,000 to obtain deputy leadership. We've heard that kind of thing before.
The problem is that Brown might be lucky to have anyone as suitable as Harman, bearing in mind his other choices. At least she must be better than Prescott.
There is also the NHS, still in bad shape and even more corrupt than it was, I think. In fairness to Harman there are a lot of problems, for example the new MRSA report by the respected Soil Association, a new and very pressing problem, especially bearing in mind how Brown's PFI has buggered such hospitals as Hampstead Royal Free with existing MRSA problems. I noticed myself how dirty the hospitals were since PFI, following a brief sojourn therein.
From Brown's POV, and probably the country's, an early election does not seem advisable
IMO: I still really do not feel I could favour the new words, to the tune of 'YMCA'. "You'll all get MRSA, You'll all get MRSA, You can't get yourselves clean, You can't have a good meal, You can't do whatever you feel..." etc. etc. As Harman says, at least Brown is better than Cameron.
Also, she and her husband Dromey exposed the £14mn loans for peerages matter. There must be plenty more there to expose, such as Brown's own Charity fraud. I am further a little puzzled still about her own need, and what her financial involvement is, in borrowing £10,000 to obtain deputy leadership. We've heard that kind of thing before.
The problem is that Brown might be lucky to have anyone as suitable as Harman, bearing in mind his other choices. At least she must be better than Prescott.
There is also the NHS, still in bad shape and even more corrupt than it was, I think. In fairness to Harman there are a lot of problems, for example the new MRSA report by the respected Soil Association, a new and very pressing problem, especially bearing in mind how Brown's PFI has buggered such hospitals as Hampstead Royal Free with existing MRSA problems. I noticed myself how dirty the hospitals were since PFI, following a brief sojourn therein.
From Brown's POV, and probably the country's, an early election does not seem advisable
IMO: I still really do not feel I could favour the new words, to the tune of 'YMCA'. "You'll all get MRSA, You'll all get MRSA, You can't get yourselves clean, You can't have a good meal, You can't do whatever you feel..." etc. etc. As Harman says, at least Brown is better than Cameron.
# posted by uv : 5:03 AM
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]
