Monday, August 07, 2006
Blogs and Bloggers
http://cryptome.org/ said: Richard Tomlinson v. MI6 blog has been shut by request of HMG which bluffed craven US-based Typepad.com.
raincoaster.wordpress.com/ said on August 7: For the record, Richard Tomlinson is no donkey, but he is a self-serving, untrustworthy user. This, of course, isn’t a prosecutable offence, but it makes him more predictable. That’s my point.
But wiki may come somewhere close to an understanding of all this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Tomlinson
"During an interview in "Hardtalk", televised around the globe on BBC World, Tomlinson raises a pertinent question to the interviewer, Tim Sebastian. - He asks why, considering the historical importance of the death of the Princess of Wales, he is constantly hassled by the secret services for simply pointing out the bizarre similarity of the active plan MI6 had poised to assassinate Milosevic in 1992, and all the details of the crash which resulted in the Princess's death in 1997."
IMO: If that is true, I recall some (probably reputedly CIA) book about, perhaps, the assassination of leading US dignitaries which suggested: "If I were a US citizen who wished to assassinate President X, I would use a Kalashnikov or an Arisaka rifle, NOT a US rifle". In other words, Tomlinson's comments simply suggest the cause of any assassination was SOMEONE OTHER than MI6. Well, maybe it was a 'double-bluff' but why? The obvious assassin would be Al Fayed - if there was an assassination. More likely the silly repetitive stories are usual newspaper timewasting. One can only hope that Al Fayed's 'retirement pension' to Lord Stephens results in Al Fayed's arrest. But I have no reason to hope to trust the honesty of 'bent coppers'. And Tomlinson's book, referred to on Wiki and which his blog tries to publicise? Not worth reading.
Oh dear, what a waste of all our time.
raincoaster.wordpress.com/ said on August 7: For the record, Richard Tomlinson is no donkey, but he is a self-serving, untrustworthy user. This, of course, isn’t a prosecutable offence, but it makes him more predictable. That’s my point.
But wiki may come somewhere close to an understanding of all this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Tomlinson
"During an interview in "Hardtalk", televised around the globe on BBC World, Tomlinson raises a pertinent question to the interviewer, Tim Sebastian. - He asks why, considering the historical importance of the death of the Princess of Wales, he is constantly hassled by the secret services for simply pointing out the bizarre similarity of the active plan MI6 had poised to assassinate Milosevic in 1992, and all the details of the crash which resulted in the Princess's death in 1997."
IMO: If that is true, I recall some (probably reputedly CIA) book about, perhaps, the assassination of leading US dignitaries which suggested: "If I were a US citizen who wished to assassinate President X, I would use a Kalashnikov or an Arisaka rifle, NOT a US rifle". In other words, Tomlinson's comments simply suggest the cause of any assassination was SOMEONE OTHER than MI6. Well, maybe it was a 'double-bluff' but why? The obvious assassin would be Al Fayed - if there was an assassination. More likely the silly repetitive stories are usual newspaper timewasting. One can only hope that Al Fayed's 'retirement pension' to Lord Stephens results in Al Fayed's arrest. But I have no reason to hope to trust the honesty of 'bent coppers'. And Tomlinson's book, referred to on Wiki and which his blog tries to publicise? Not worth reading.
Oh dear, what a waste of all our time.
# posted by uv : 7:21 PM
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]
